This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by MESSNER, M. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Limits of "The Male Sex Role"

An Analysis of the Men's Liberation and Men's Rights Movements' Discourse

University of Southern California

Some feminists have seen sex role theory as limited, even dangerous; others see it as useful mid-range theory. This article sheds light on this debate through an examination of the discourse of the men's liberation movement of the 1970s. Men's liberation leaders grappled with the paradox of simultaneously acknowledging men's institutional privileges and the costs of masculinity to men. The language of sex roles was the currency through which they negotiated this paradox. By the late 1970s, men's liberation had disappeared. The conservative and moderate wings of men's liberation became an anti-feminist men's rights movement, facilitated by the language of sex roles. The progressive wing of men's liberation abandoned sex role language and formed a profeminist movement premised on a language of gender relations and power. The article ends with a discussion of the implications of this case for debates about sex role theory, and urges the study of contemporary organizations whose discourse is based on the language of sex roles.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Mann Men's Rights and Feminist Advocacy in Canadian Domestic Violence Policy Arenas: Contexts, Dynamics, and Outcomes of Antifeminist Backlash Feminist Criminology, January 1, 2008; 3(1): 44 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Anderson Who Gets Out?: Gender as Structure and the Dissolution of Violent Heterosexual Relationships Gender Society, April 1, 2007; 21(2): 173 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Anderson and C. Accomando `Real' Boys? Manufacturing Masculinity and Erasing Privilege in Popular Books on Raising Boys Feminism Psychology, November 1, 2002; 12(4): 491 - 516. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. ANDERSON and D. UMBERSON GENDERING VIOLENCE: Masculinity and Power in Men's Accounts of Domestic Violence Gender Society, June 1, 2001; 15(3): 358 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. McGUFFEY and B. L. RICH PLAYING IN THE GENDER TRANSGRESSION ZONE: Race, Class, and Hegemonic Masculinity in Middle Childhood Gender Society, October 1, 1999; 13(5): 608 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]