Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leahey, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6, 754-780 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243206293030

Gender Differences in Productivity

Research Specialization as a Missing Link

Erin Leahey

University of Arizona

Since 1984, when Cole and Zuckerman referred to gender differences in productivity among academic scientists as a puzzle, sociologists have sought to explain these differences by incorporating primarily institutional-level factors. In addition to these factors, the author contends that an undertheorized and heretofore unmeasured concept—the extent of research specialization—can also help explain the process by which gender affects research productivity. Although some researchers have examined areas of specialization, the extent of research specialization has been completely neglected in studies of academic careers. Using a probability sample of academics in two disciplines (sociology and linguistics), primary data collection, and simultaneous equation modeling, the author finds that the extent of research specialization is a critical intervening variable: Women specialize less than men and thereby lose out on an important means of increasing their productivity.

Key Words: gender • academic science • research productivity • specialization

References

  • Allison, P. D., and J. S. Long. 1987. Interuniversity mobility of academic scientists. American Sociological Review 52: 643-652.[CrossRef]
  • Anderson, T. W. 1957. Maximum likelihood estimates for multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 52: 200-203.[CrossRef]
  • Barbezat, Debra A. 1987a. Salary differentials by sex in the academic labor market. Journal of Human Resources 22: 422-428.[CrossRef]
  • Barbezat, Debra A. 1987b. Salary differentials or sex discrimination? Evidence from the academic labor market. Population Research and Policy Review 6: 69-84.
  • Bayer, A. E., and H. S. Astin. 1975. Sex differentials in the academic reward system. Science 188: 796-802.[Free Full Text]
  • Blau, Peter J. 1977. Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
  • Blau, Peter J. 1994. The organization of academic work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Bollen, Kenneth. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Burt, Ronald. 1998. The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society 10: 5-46.[Abstract]
  • Burt, Ronald. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349-399.[CrossRef]
  • Carroll, Glenn R. 1985. Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 90: 1262-1283.[CrossRef]
  • Clemens, E. S., W. W. Powell, K. McIlwaine, and D. Okamoto. 1995. Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputation. American Journal of Sociology 101: 433-494.[CrossRef]
  • Cole, J. R., and H. Zuckerman. 1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2: 217-258.
  • Dean, Dwight G. 1989. Structural constraints and the publication dilemma: A review and some proposals. American Sociologist 20: 181-187.
  • Dietz, J. S., I. Chompalov, B. Bozeman, E. O. Lane, and J. Park. 2000. Using the curriculum vita to study the career paths of scientists and engineers: An exploratory assessment. Scientometrics 49: 419-442.[CrossRef]
  • Dogan, M., and R. Pahre. 1989a. Fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences. Studies in Comparative International Development 24: 56-73.
  • Dogan, M., and R. Pahre. 1989b. Hybrid fields in the social sciences. International Social Science Journal 41: 457-470.
  • Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, B. Uzzi, and J. Alonzo. 1994. The paradox of critical mass for women in science. Science 266: 51-54.[Free Full Text]
  • Ferber, M. A., and J. W. Loeb. 1973. Performance, rewards and perceptions of sex discrimination among male and female faculty. American Journal of Sociology 78: 995-1002.[CrossRef]
  • Ferree, M. M., and J. McQuillan. 1998. Gender-based pay gaps: Methodological and policy issues in university salary studies. Gender & Society 12: 7-39.[Abstract]
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 1983. Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science 13: 285-305.[Abstract]
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 1985. Location, sex-typing, and salary among academics. Work and Occupations 12 (2): 186-205.[Abstract]
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 1989. Disciplinary fragmentation, peer review, and the publication process. American Sociologist 20: 188-191.
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 1992. Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education 65: 293-305.[CrossRef]
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 2001. Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society 15: 654-666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fox, Mary Frank. 2005. Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35: 131-150.[Abstract]
  • Fox, M. F., and C. A. Faver. 1985. Men, women, and publication productivity: Patterns among social work academics. Sociological Quarterly 26: 537-549.[CrossRef]
  • Fox, M. F., and P. E. Stephan. 2001. Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science 31: 109-122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Goldberger, M. L., B. A. Maher, and P. E. Flattau. 1995. Research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Grant, L., and K. B. Ward. 1991. Gender and publishing in sociology. Gender & Society 5: 207-223.[Abstract]
  • Grant, L., K. B. Ward, and D. Bottenfield. 1993. Women’s sociological research and writing in the pre-WWII era as reflected in journals. Miami, FL: American Sociological Meetings.
  • Grant, L., K. B. Ward, and X. L. Rong. 1987. Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research? American Sociological Review 52: 856-862.[CrossRef]
  • Guetzkow, J., M. Lamont, and G. Mallard. 2004. What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review 69: 190-212.
  • Haberfeld, Y., and Y. Shenhav. 1990. Are women and Blacks closing the gap? Salary discrimination in American science during the 1970s and 1980s. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 44: 38-82.
  • Hargens, L. L., and W. O. Hagstrom. 1982. Scientific consensus and academic status attainment patterns. Sociology of Education 55: 183-196.
  • Heinsler, J. M., and R. A. Rosenfeld. 1987. Charting academic careers: Does data source make a difference? Social Studies of Science 17: 135-144.[Abstract]
  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Keith, B., J. S. Layne, N. Babchuk, and K. Johnson. 2002. The context of scientific achievement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces 80: 1253-1282.
  • Leahey, Erin. 2006. Conceptual metaphors and empirical leaps: Measuring scientific innovation and its impact. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Levin, S. G., and P. E. Stephan. 1989. Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education 30: 531-549.[CrossRef]
  • Liebert, Roland J. 1976. Productivity, favor, and grants among scholars. American Journal of Sociology 82: 664-673.[CrossRef]
  • Lin, N., W. M. Ensel, and J. C. Vaughn. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review 46: 393-405.[CrossRef]
  • Long, J. Scott. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71: 159-178.[CrossRef]
  • Long, J. S., P. Allison, and R. McGinnis. 1993. Rank-advancement in scientific careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review 58: 703-722.[CrossRef]
  • Long, J. S., and M. F. Fox. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45-71.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Lutz, Catherine. 1990. The erasure of women’s writings in sociocultural anthropology. American Ethnologist 17: 611-627.[CrossRef]
  • McBrier, Debra Branch. 2003. Gender and career dynamics within a segmented professional labor market: The case of law academia. Social Forces 81: 1201-1266.
  • National Research Council. 2001. From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers, edited by J. S. Long. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Paglin, M., and A. M. Rufolo. 1990. Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics 8: 123-144.
  • Preston, Anne E. 2004. Leaving science: Occupational exits from scientific careers. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Prpic, Katarina. 2002. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics 55: 27-58.[CrossRef]
  • Renzulli, L. A., H. Aldrich, and J. Moody. 2000. Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces 79: 523-546.[CrossRef]
  • Reskin, Barbara. 1977. Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review 42: 491-504.[CrossRef]
  • Reskin, Barbara. 1978. Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology 83: 1235-1243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Reskin, Barbara. 2003. Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review 68: 1-21.
  • Rosser, Sue V. 2004. The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed. New York: Routledge.
  • Sonnert, G., and G. Holton. 1995. Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Tam, Tony. 1997. Sex segregation and occupational gender inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 102: 1652-1692.[CrossRef]
  • Turner, S. P., and J. H. Turner. 1990. The impossible science: An institutional analysis of American sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Wagner-Dobler, Roland. 1997. Self-organization of scientific specialization and diversification: A quantitative case study. Social Studies of Science 27: 147-170.[Abstract]
  • Wanner, R. A., L. S. Lewis, and D. I. Gregorio. 1981. Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Sociology of Education 54: 238-253.[CrossRef]
  • Ward, K. B., and L. Grant. 1995. Gender and academic publishing. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 11: 172-212.
  • Weeden, Kim A. 2002. Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 108: 55-101.[CrossRef]
  • Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1998. Sex difference in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63: 847-870.[CrossRef]
  • Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 2003. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Zuckerman, E. W., T.-Y. Kim, K. Ukanwa, and J. von Rittmann. 2003. Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. American Journal of Sociology 108 (5): 1018-1074.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leahey, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?