|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Gender & Society, Vol. 20, No. 6,
781-804 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0891243206292002
"Hitting is not Manly"
Domestic Violence Court and the Re-Imagination of the Patriarchal State
Rekha Mirchandani
Bowling Green State University
In this study, the author investigates how the battered women’s movement has transformed the treatment of domestic violence in Salt Lake City’s specialized domestic violence court. Using Lisa Brush’s account of how the state promotes the dominance of men and the disadvantage of women, the author shows that Salt Lake City’s domestic violence court transforms both its governance of gender and its gender of governance, lending support to optimistic theories of the state. The author argues that this court is an example of a state institution that has been transformed into a feminist regime committed to individual and social change. The author encourages feminist theorists to engage with the work of Jurgen Habermas to better conceptualize the potentially positive relations among the state, social movements, and social change.
Key Words: problem-solving courts • domestic violence • social movements • the state • social change
References
- Abramovitz, Mimi. 1988. Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston: South End.
- Adams, Julia, and Tasleem Padamsee. 2001. Signs and regimes: Rereading feminist work on welfare states. Social Politics 8: 2-23.
- American Bar Association. 2001. http://www.abanet.org/ftp/pub/yld/2001assemagenda/117.pdf. Retrieved 28 July 2002.
- Berman, Greg, ed. 2000. What is a traditional judge? Judicature 84: 78-78.
- Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt. 2001. Problem-solving courts: A brief primer. Law & Policy 23: 125-125.
- Berman, Greg, and John Feinblatt. 2005. Good courts: The case for problem-solving justice. New York: New Press.
- Brush, Lisa D. 2002. Changing the subject: Gender and welfare regime studies. Social Politics 9: 161-186.[Abstract]
- Brush, Lisa D. 2003. Gender and governance. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
- Bush, Diane Mitsch. 1992. Women’s movements and state policy reform aimed at domestic violence against women: A comparison of movement mobilization in U.S. and India. Gender & Society 6: 587-608.[Abstract]
- Butts, Jeffrey A. 2001. Introduction: Problem-solving courts. Law & Policy 23: 121-121.[CrossRef]
- Center for Court Innovation. 2003. http://www.problem-solvingcourts.org. Retrieved 3 May 2005.
- Clapp, Elizabeth J. 1998. Mothers of all children: Women reformers and the rise of juvenile courts in progressive era America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Conference of Chief Justices. 2000. http://cosca.ncsc.dni.us/Resolutions/resolutionproblemsolvingcts.html. Retrieved 28 July 2002.
- Conference of State Court Administrators. 2000. http://cosca.ncsc.dni.us/Resolutions/resolutionproblemsolvingcts.html. Retrieved 28 July 2002.
- Criminal Justice Newsletter. 2000. Domestic violence courts said to reduce recidivism. Criminal Justice Newsletter 31-31.
- Daly, Kathleen. 1989. Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations, and sentencing. Gender & Society 3: 9-36.[Abstract]
- Eaton, Leslie, and Leslie Kaufman. 2005. In problem-solving court, judges turn therapist. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/26/nyregion/26courts.html. Retrieved 26 April 2005.
- Eisenstein, H. 1996. Inside agitators: Austrialian femocrats and the state. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
- Elman, R. Amy. 1996. Sexual subordination and state intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence, RI: Berghahn.
- Epstein, Deborah. 1999. Effective intervention in domestic violence cases: Rethinking the roles of prosecutors, judges and the court system. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 11: 3-3.
- Feldman, Shelley. 2001. Exploring theories of patriarchy: A perspective from contemporary Bangladesh. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 26: 1097-1127.
- Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Goldkamp, John S. 2002. Problem-solving courts: From adversarial litigation to innovative jurisprudence: Eleventh annual symposium on contemporary urban challenges: Thursday, February 28, 2002: Afternoon session: The changing face of justice: Alternative approaches to problem-solving. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29: 2000-2000.
- Goldkamp, John S., Doris Weiland, Mark Collins, and Michael D. White. 1996. The role of drug and alcohol abuse in domestic violence and its treatment: Dade County’s domestic violence court experiment. Report to the National Institute of Justice. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.
- Gordon, Linda, and Allen Hunter. 1998. Not all male dominance is patriarchal. Radical History Review 71: 71-83.
- Gover, A. R., J. M. McDonald, and G. P. Alpert. 2003. Combating domestic violence: Findings from an evaluation of a local domestic violence court. Criminology & Public Policy 3: 109-132.[CrossRef]
- Habermas, Jurgen. [1962] 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere, trans. by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, Jurgen. 1996a. Between facts and norms, trans. by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, Jurgen. 1996b. Paradigms of law. Cardozo Law Review 17: 771-771.
- Habermas, Jurgen. 1998. On the relation between the nation, the rule of law, and democracy. In The inclusion of the other. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Habermas, Jurgen. 2001. Constitutional democracy: A paradoxical union of contradictory principles? Political Theory 29: 766-781.[Free Full Text]
- Haney, Lynne. 1996. Homeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction of male dominance. American Sociological Review 61: 759-778.[CrossRef]
- Jack, Rand, and Dana Crowley Jack. 1989. Moral vision and professional decisions: The changing values of women and men lawyers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kapur, Ratna. 1996. Feminist terrains in legal domains: An introduction. In Feminist terrains in legal domains: Interdisciplinary essays on women and law in India. New Delhi, India: Raj Press.
- Kapur, Ratna. 2005. Erotic justice: Law and the new politics of postcolonialism. London: Glasshouse Press.
- Kapur, Ratna, and Brenda Cossman. 1996. Subversive sites: Feminist engagements with the law in India. New Delhi, India: Sage.
- Kaye, Judith S. 2002. Problem-solving courts: From adversarial litigation to innovative jurisprudence: Eleventh annual symposium on contemporary urban challenges: Thursday, February 28, 2002: Afternoon session: The changing face of fustice: Keynote address. Fordham Urban Law Journal 29: 1925-1925.
- Kingfisher, Catherine P. 1996. Women in the American welfare trap. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Mazur, Amy G., ed. 2001. State feminism, women’s movements and job training: Making democracies work in the global economy. New York: Routledge.
- Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1985. Portia in a different voice: Speculations on a lawyering process. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal 1: 39-39.
- Menon, Nivedita. 1999. Gender and politics in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
- Menon, Nivedita, ed. 2004. Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Muncy, Robyn. 1991. Creating a female dominion in American reform, 1890- 1935. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nelson, Barbara J. 1990. The origins of the two-channel welfare state: Workmen’s compensation and mothers’ aid. In Women, the state and welfare, edited by Linda Gordon. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Nolan, James L. 2001. Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Nolan, James L. 2003. Community courts and community justice: Commentary: Redefining criminal courts: Problem-solving and the meaning of justice. American Criminal Law Review 40: 1541-1541.
- Olsen, Frances. [1982] 1990. The sex of law. In The politics of law: A progressive critique, edited by David Kairys. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Ostling, Richard, and Joan K. Ostling. 2000. Mormon America: The power and the promise. San Francisco: Harper.
- Padamsee, Tasleem, and Julia Adams. 2002. Signs and regimes revisited. Social Politics 9: 187-202.[Abstract]
- Pleck, Elizabeth. 1987. Domestic tyranny: The making of social policy against family violence from colonial times to present. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rivera, Ray. 1999. More judges to rule on family woes: Domestic violence court expands to cover caseloads; More judges to rule on family. Salt Lake Tribune, 3 February, D-1-D-1.
- Schechter, Susan. 1982. Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered women’s movement. Boston: South End.
- Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1992. Just the facts, ma’am: Sexualized violence, evidentiary habits, and the revision of truth. New York Law School Law Review 37: 123-123.
- Schneider, Elizabeth M. 2000. Battered women & feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Stetson, Dorothy McBride, ed. 2001. Abortion politics, women’s movements and the democratic state: A comparative study of state feminism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Amy G. Mazur. 1995. Comparative state feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Stivers, Camille. 2000. Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the Progressive Era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
- Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
- Warchol, Glen. 1999. Domestic violence group honors four for service. Salt Lake Tribune, 15 December, B-2-B-2.
- Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, policy and the problem of violence against women: A cross national comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. P. Schrock and I. Padavic
Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity in a Batterer Intervention Program
Gender Society,
October 1, 2007;
21(5):
625 - 649.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
