Gender & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to learn more

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RESKIN, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Gender & Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, 58-81 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/089124388002001005
© 1988 Sociologists for Women in Society

Conference

BRINGING THE MEN BACK IN:

Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women's Work

BARBARA F. RESKIN

University of Illinois, Urbana

To reduce sex differences in employment outcomes, we must examine them in the context of the sex-gender hierarchy. The conventional explanation for wage gap—job segregation—is incorrect because it ignores men's incentive to preserve their advantages and their ability to do so by establishing the rules that distribute rewards. The primary method through which all dominant groups maintain their hegemony is by differentiating the subordinate group and defining it as inferior and hence meriting inferior treatment. My argument implies that neither sex-integrating jobs nor implementing comparable worth will markedly improve women's employment status because men can subvert these mechanisms or even change the rules by which rewards are allocated. As evidence, I show that occupational integration has failed to advance women appreciably, and I argue that comparable worth is not likely to be much more effective. Instead, we must seek political analyses and political solutions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. Tomaskovic-Devey and K. Stainback
Discrimination and Desegregation: Equal Opportunity Progress in U.S. Private Sector Workplaces since the Civil Rights Act
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2007; 609(1): 49 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
K. E. Campbell and H. J. McCammon
Elizabeth Blackwell's Heirs: Women as Physicians in the United States, 1880-1920
Work and Occupations, August 1, 2005; 32(3): 290 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
J. R. Keene and J. R. Reynolds
The Job Costs of Family Demands: Gender Differences in Negative Family-to-Work Spillover
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2005; 26(3): 275 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
S. R. Bird and S. G. Sapp
Understanding the Gender Gap in Small Business Success: Urban and Rural Comparisons
Gender Society, February 1, 2004; 18(1): 5 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. Ward
"Not all Differences are Created Equal": Multiple Jeopardy in a Gendered Organization
Gender Society, February 1, 2004; 18(1): 82 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
M. Hultin
Some Take the Glass Escalator, Some Hit the Glass Ceiling?: Career Consequences of Occupational Sex Segregation
Work and Occupations, February 1, 2003; 30(1): 30 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. A. BARR and E. H. BOYLE
GENDER AND PROFESSIONAL PURITY: Explaining Formal and Informal Work Rewards for Physicians in Estonia
Gender Society, February 1, 2001; 15(1): 29 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
D. M. BRITTON
THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATION
Gender Society, June 1, 2000; 14(3): 418 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
I. KENNELLY
"THAT SINGLE-MOTHER ELEMENT": How White Employers Typify Black Women
Gender Society, April 1, 1999; 13(2): 168 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
V. TAYLOR
GENDER AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: Gender Processes in Women's Self-Help Movements
Gender Society, February 1, 1999; 13(1): 8 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
P. DRENTEA
Consequences of Women's Formal and Informal Job Search Methods for Employment in Female-Dominated Jobs
Gender Society, June 1, 1998; 12(3): 321 - 338.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
I. PADAVIC and J. D. ORCUTT
PERCEPTIONS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE FLORIDA LEGAL SYSTEM: A Comparison of Dominance and Spillover Explanations
Gender Society, October 1, 1997; 11(5): 682 - 698.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. D. YODER and P. ANIAKUDO
"OUTSIDER WITHIN" THE FIREHOUSE: Subordination and Difference in the Social Interactions of African American Women Firefighters
Gender Society, June 1, 1997; 11(3): 324 - 341.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary EthnographyHome page
R. HERTZ
GUARDING AGAINST WOMEN?: Responses of Military Men and Their Wives to Gender Integration
Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, July 1, 1996; 25(2): 251 - 284.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
G. RANSON and W. J. REEVES
GENDER, EARNINGS, AND PROPORTIONS OF WOMEN: Lessons from a High-Tech Occupation
Gender Society, April 1, 1996; 10(2): 168 - 184.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
S. E. TALLICHET
GENDERED RELATIONS IN THE MINES AND THE DIVISION OF LABOR UNDERGROUND
Gender Society, December 1, 1995; 9(6): 697 - 711.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
P. Y. MARTIN and S. HARKREADER
Multiple Gender Contexts and Employee Rewards
Work and Occupations, August 1, 1993; 20(3): 296 - 336.
[Abstract]


Home page
Rationality and SocietyHome page
J. A. JACOBS
Economic and Sociological Explanations of Gender Inequality
Rationality and Society, July 1, 1993; 5(3): 386 - 397.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
D. A. Luke, L. Roberts, and J. Rappaport
Individual, Group Context, and Individual-Group Fit Predictors of Self-Help Group Attendance
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 1993; 29(2): 216 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
B. F. RESKIN and C. E. ROSS
Jobs, Authority, and Earnings Among Managers: The Continuing Significance of Sex
Work and Occupations, November 1, 1992; 19(4): 342 - 365.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
N. ANDES
SOCIAL CLASS AND GENDER:: An Empirical Evaluation of Occupational Stratification
Gender Society, June 1, 1992; 6(2): 231 - 251.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
H. WARTENBERG
Book Reviews
Gender Society, March 1, 1992; 6(1): 146 - 150.



Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
K. A. LOSCOCCO and J. ROBINSON
BARRIERS TO WOMEN'S SMALL-BUSINESS SUCCESS IN THE UNITED STATES
Gender Society, December 1, 1991; 5(4): 511 - 532.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
A. S. WHARTON
STRUCTURE AND AGENCY IN SOCIALIST-FEMINIST THEORY
Gender Society, September 1, 1991; 5(3): 373 - 389.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. D. YODER
RETHINKING TOKENISM:: Looking Beyond Numbers
Gender Society, June 1, 1991; 5(2): 178 - 192.
[Abstract]


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. B. AGASSI
THEORIES OF GENDER EQUALITY:: Lessons from the Israeli Kibbutz
Gender Society, June 1, 1989; 3(2): 160 - 186.
[Abstract]